'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]'
------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
Rules: {h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))}
Details:
We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs:
{h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
The usable rules are:
{h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))}
The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges:
{h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
==> {h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
We consider the following path(s):
1) {h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
The usable rules for this path are the following:
{h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))}
We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs.
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
Rules:
{ h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))
, h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
h(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
f(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [8]
a() = [8]
h^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment''
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))}
Weak Rules: {h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
Details:
The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment':
'Bounds with default enrichment'
--------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a()))}
Weak Rules: {h^#(f(x, y)) -> c_0(h^#(h(x)))}
Details:
The problem is Match-bounded by 2.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ h_0(2) -> 6
, h_0(3) -> 6
, h_1(2) -> 10
, h_1(3) -> 10
, h_1(10) -> 8
, h_2(2) -> 15
, h_2(3) -> 15
, h_2(15) -> 13
, f_0(2, 2) -> 2
, f_0(2, 3) -> 2
, f_0(3, 2) -> 2
, f_0(3, 3) -> 2
, f_1(2, 7) -> 6
, f_1(2, 7) -> 10
, f_1(2, 7) -> 15
, f_1(3, 7) -> 6
, f_1(3, 7) -> 10
, f_1(3, 7) -> 15
, f_1(8, 9) -> 7
, f_2(7, 12) -> 8
, f_2(7, 12) -> 13
, f_2(13, 14) -> 12
, a_0() -> 3
, a_1() -> 9
, a_2() -> 14
, h^#_0(2) -> 4
, h^#_0(3) -> 4
, h^#_0(6) -> 5
, h^#_1(10) -> 11
, c_0_0(5) -> 4
, c_0_1(11) -> 5
, c_0_1(11) -> 11}